Journal of Modeling and Simulation in Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Journal of Modeling and Simulation in Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Comparative Thermal Loss Analysis of a Dual Active Bridge Converter With and Without LLL Resonant Tank for EV Charger Applications

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
Amir Hossein H Najaei
Naser Eskandarian
Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.
10.22075/mseee.2026.40617.1254
Abstract
Dual Active Bridge (DAB) DC–DC converters are commonly used in high-power isolated systems, including on-board and off-board electric vehicle chargers, because of their inherent bidirectional power transfer capability and compact design. However, as charging power levels and efficiency targets continue to rise in modern EV infrastructures, the associated increase in semiconductor losses and device temperatures makes thermal performance a critical design concern. Despite the advantages, traditional DAB converters with single-phase shift (SPS) control tend to incur considerable switching losses, especially at high power levels, which can raise semiconductor junction temperatures. In particular, the lack of a detailed, application-oriented comparison between the thermal loss behavior of conventional DAB converters and resonant-assisted variants under realistic EV charging conditions limits designers’ ability to select the most thermally efficient topology. For this reason, the power-loss characteristics and thermal response of a conventional DAB converter, related to its switches, are evaluated and compared with those of an LLL-tank-assisted DAB topology. The two converter topologies are modeled in MATLAB/Simulink and PLECS and tested under identical operating conditions, including power level and control method, so that the results can be directly compared. Semiconductor losses are then estimated by considering both conduction and switching components, with switching energy values taken from the IGBT manufacturer’s datasheet. Junction temperature is then estimated through a steady-state thermal resistance model that relates total power dissipation to ambient conditions. The influence of the LLL resonant tank on converter current profiles and thermal stress is analyzed. Simulation results show that introducing the LLL resonant tank reduces switching and conduction losses, thereby lowering the junction temperature of the power semiconductor devices compared with the conventional DAB converter. This improvement is achieved without altering the original SPS control approach. The outcomes of this work offer valuable guidance for thermally optimized design of high-power isolated DC–DC converters used in electric vehicle charging systems, bridging an important gap between efficiency-oriented analysis and comprehensive thermal loss evaluation for practical EV charger applications.
This work presents a systematic comparative thermal loss analysis of a Dual Active Bridge (DAB) converter operating with and without an LLL resonant tank, specifically for high-power EV charger applications. Unlike prior studies that primarily focus on efficiency enhancement or soft-switching performance of resonant-assisted DAB topologies, this study provides a detailed device-level evaluation of thermal and loss distribution under identical operating conditions. The proposed comparison framework quantifies conduction and switching losses and the resulting impact on system-level thermal management requirements. This approach enables a clearer understanding of the trade-offs between conventional DAB and LLL-assisted configurations in terms of efficiency, thermal performance, and practical constraints for EV charger implementation.
Keywords
Dual Active Bridge Converter
LLL Resonant Tank
Switching Loss Analysis
Thermal Modeling
Junction Temperature
Electric Vehicle Chargers
Subjects
[1]      J. He, Y. Chen, J. Lin, J. Chen, L. Cheng, and Y. Wang,        “Review of Modeling, Modulation, and Control  Strategies for the Dual-Active-Bridge DC/DC Converter,”   Energies, vol. 16, no. 18, p. 6646, 2023.
[2]      L. Shao, Z. Shan, F. Gao, H. Chen, D. Sha, and T.  Dragicevic, “Modeling and Advanced Control of Dual-  Active-Bridge DC–DC Converters: A Review,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1524–1547, Feb. 2022.
[3]      R. W. De Doncker, D. M. Divan, and M. H. Kheraluwala, “A Three-Phase Soft-Switched High-Power-Density    DC/DC Converter for High-Power Applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 63–73, Jan. 1991.
[4]      Mohammed Masud Ranam SM Mahfuz Alam, Faiaz Allahma Rafi, Swarup Bashu Deb, etc. ”Comprehensive review on the charging Technologies of electric vehicles(EV) and their impact on power grid,” IEEE Access, 2025.
[5]      H. Qin and J. W. Kimball, “Generalized average modeling of dual active bridge DC–DC converter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electronics, vol.27, no. 4, pp. 2078-2084, Apr. 2012.
[6]      Mohamed R. Farid, Ahmed L. Elrefai, Sobhy M. Abdelkader, “Comparative Analysis of Single phase shift and Extended phase shift modulations in Dual Active Bridge Converters for EV fast chargers,” Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 2026.
[7]      M. Ciappa, “Selected failure mechanisms of modern power modules,” Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 42, no. 4–5, pp. 653–667, 2002.
[8]      A. Castellazzi, A. Fayyaz, G. Romano, L. Yang, M. Riccio, and A. Irace, “SiC power MOSFETs performance, robustness, and technology maturity,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 803–815, Sep. 2016.
[9]      J. Everts, “Closed-Form Solution for Efficient ZVS Modulation of DAB Converters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 7561–7576, Oct. 2017.
[10]   S. Inoue and H. Akagi, “A bidirectional DC–DC converter for an energy storage system with galvanic isolation,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2299–2306, Nov. 2007.
[11]   B. Zhao, Q. Song, W. Liu, and Y. Sun, “Overview of dual-active-bridge isolated bidirectional DC–DC converter and its current control strategies,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 4091–4106, Aug. 2014.
[12]   F. Krismer and J. W. Kolar, “Efficiency-optimized high- current dual active bridge converter for automotive applications,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 2745–2760, Jul. 2012.
[13]   Tarek Younis, Fahad Saleh Al-Ismail, Syed Muhammad Amrr, SM Suhail Hussain,” Optimization strategies for triple-phase-shift Modulation in Dual-Active-Bridge Converters: A Comprehensive Review,” IEEE Access, 2025.
[14]   Jiayang He, Yangyu Chen, Jiongtao Lin, Jianghui Chen, Li Cheng, Yu Wang,” Review of Modeling, Modulation, and Control Strategies for the Dual-Active-Bridge DC/DC Converter,” Energies, 2023.
[15]   R. Beiranvand, B. Rashidian, M. R. Zolghadri, and S. M. H. Alavi, “A design procedure for optimizing the LLC resonant converter as a wide output range voltage source,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 3749–3763, Aug. 2012.
[16]   J. Sun, “Small-signal methods for AC distributed power systems—A review,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2545–2554, Nov. 2009.
[17]   Y. Wang, W. Li, Y. Deng, and X. He, “A novel dual active bridge DC–DC converter with reduced circulating current,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 5060–5070, Jul. 2016.
[18]   M. R. Ahmed, R. Todd, and A. J. Forsyth, “Predictive control of bidirectional DC–DC converters in energy storage systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 3451–3461, Jun. 2016.
[19]   Texas Instruments, “Bidirectional CLLLC Resonant Dual Active Bridge Reference Design for HEV/EV Onboard Chargers,” Application Report, 2020.
[20]   Z. Fang, J. Wang, and D. Xu, “Soft-switching range extension of dual-active-bridge converters by resonant tank integration,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1304–1315, Feb. 2018.
[21]   Y. Shi, R. Li, and F. C. Lee, “LLL resonant dual active bridge converter with enhanced ZVS capability,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 8653–8665, Sep. 2019.
[22]   A. Boglietti, A. Cavagnino, M. Lazzari, and M. Pastorelli, “Thermal analysis of electrical machines and power electronics,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 35–44, Jan.–  Feb. 2009.
[23]   Liting Li, Guo Xu, Deshang Sha, Yonglu Liu, Yao Sun, Mei Su, “Review of Dual-Active-Bridge Converters with topological modifications” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 9046-9076, 2023.
[24]   P. Ning, F. Wang, and D. Boroyevich, “Thermal-oriented design and optimization of power electronic converters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 4806–4819, Oct. 2013.
[25]   M. Ciappa and W. Fichtner, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 43, no. 9–11, pp. 1653–1658, 2003.
[26]   Infineon Technologies, “IKQ50N120CH3 IGBT Datasheet,” Infineon Technologies AG, 2019.
[27]   N. Mohan, T. M. Undeland, and W. P. Robbins, Power Electronics: Converters, Applications, and Design, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2003.
[28]   U. Drofenik and J. W. Kolar, “A general scheme for calculating switching- and conduction-losses of power semiconductors,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 4196–4207, Dec. 2008.
[29]   M. Swetha, K. Susmitha, C. Sairam, V. Venkata Teja, B. Sravani, “Design and simulation of Dual Active Bridge Converter for EV battery charging applications,” CRC Press, 2025.
Journal of Modeling and Simulation in Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 05 September 2026

  • Receive Date 16 February 2026
  • Revise Date 09 May 2026
  • Accept Date 07 June 2026